01
Substantial Defect
One that impairs the use, value or safety of the vehicle. Stalling, brake failure, steering and persistent electrical faults qualify. A rattle generally does not.
By Manufacturer
TOYOTA LEMON LAW.
Toyota's biggest recent campaigns are not broken parts. They are startup software faults that blank the instrument cluster or freeze the reversing camera — intermittent by nature, and very hard to get a dealership to reproduce.
+25 Years of Experience
Direct Attorney Access
No Fees Unless You Win
Bad VehicleToyota claims.
EXPLORE ↓What Decides It
Four facts, in this order.
Toyota built it, but Toyota does not decide it. These four questions decide it, and the repair orders in your glovebox answer all four.
02
Repair Attempts
Florida looks for three attempts at the same defect. New York looks for four. Recall work and visits that found nothing both count.
03
Days Out of Service
Thirty cumulative days in Florida and in New York. Cumulative, not consecutive, and the days count whether or not anything was fixed.
04
Coverage Window
The defect has to be reported while the vehicle is inside the warranty or rights period. When it was reported matters more than today's date.
Toyota's reputation for reliability is real, and it is also why owners of a defective Toyota wait far too long before acting. The assumption is that the problem must be them. The recall record says otherwise: campaign 25V744 alone covered 1,024,407 Toyota, Lexus and Subaru vehicles for a camera that freezes or blanks in reverse.
The pattern in Toyota's largest 2025 and 2026 campaigns is software, not hardware. A startup fault leaves the instrument panel unable to display speed, brake or tire-pressure warnings — 591,377 vehicles under 25V595, then another 508,354 Camry Hybrids under 26V511. Software faults are intermittent, and a dealership that cannot reproduce one often writes "no fault found".
A visit where nothing was found is still a repair attempt. That is the single most valuable thing to understand about a software-driven defect. Owners routinely discard the paperwork from those visits because nothing was fixed, and in doing so throw away the record that would have completed their count.
Jonathan D. Schwartz has +25 years of experience handling Lemon Law and warranty matters, including claims against Toyota. Bad Vehicle offers a free case evaluation, direct access to the attorney handling the claim, and no upfront legal fee to begin pursuing an eligible case.
Recall or Claim
A recall says Toyota knows. A claim says they were given the chance to fix it.
A recall is the manufacturer acknowledging that a defect exists across a population of vehicles and offering a remedy. It is a public admission of the fault pattern, which makes it useful evidence. What it is not is a Lemon Law claim.
The claim arises from what happened to your vehicle: the defect was reported, the dealership was given a reasonable number of attempts to repair it, and it is still there. A Toyota recall notice or technical service bulletin covering the fault on your model proves the manufacturer already knew.
One Toyota campaign number frequently covers Toyota, Lexus and even Subaru vehicles at once, because Lexus has no separate NHTSA manufacturer record and Toyota builds the Subaru Solterra. If your campaign number pulls up other badges, that is normal and it does not weaken anything.
Check My Case ↗
Check before the next visit
A visit where the dealer found nothing is still a repair attempt. Keep the paperwork.
Three visits for one fault is not normal wear.
Check My Case ↗Recurring Toyota Faults
WHAT KEEPS COMING BACK.
These are the defect categories that generate the most Lemon Law and warranty claims against Toyota. A vehicle showing one of these is not automatically a claim. A vehicle showing one of these repeatedly and unrepaired usually is.
Rearview Camera Blackout
Campaign 25V744 covered 1,024,407 Toyota, Lexus and Subaru vehicles whose Panoramic View Monitor freezes or blanks in reverse, breaching the federal rear-visibility standard FMVSS 111.
Instrument Cluster Failure
25V595 recalled 591,377 vehicles that may not display speed, brake or tire-pressure warnings at startup, and 26V511 added 508,354 Camry Hybrids for a related cluster blackout.
Twin-Turbo V6 Engine Failure
25V767 recalled 126,691 Tundra, Lexus LX and GX vehicles where machining debris contaminates the V35A engine and destroys the main bearings, causing stalling and loss of drive power.
Door Switch Short Circuits
26V049 recalled 141,286 Prius and Prius Prime hatchbacks because water entering the rear door switch can short the circuit and let an unlocked rear door open while driving.
Seat and Restraint Defects
26V128 recalled 686,588 Highlanders whose second-row seat backs may not lock into position, leaving an occupant unrestrained in a crash.
Startup Software Faults
Toyota's largest recent campaigns trace to startup software errors rather than broken hardware, producing intermittent symptoms that dealerships frequently cannot replicate or permanently repair across repeated visits.
Where It Ends Up
Four ways a Toyota claim resolves.
Which one applies depends on the state, the facts and what gets negotiated with Toyota. All four start with the same free case review.
The models we see most
Recall record · NHTSA · September 2026
TOYOTANOT A BROKEN PART. A LINE OF CODE. 1,024,407 VEHICLES.
01 / 2022-2026
1,024,407
Rearview camera freezes in reverse — RAV4, Highlander, Grand Highlander, Prius, Camry Hybrid, Crown, Sienna Hybrid, bZ4X, Mirai and Venza, plus many Lexus models and the Subaru Solterra.
Check My Case ↗
02 / HIGHLANDER, 2021-2025
686,588
Second-row seat backs fail to lock — The seat back may not latch during adjustment, so it may not restrain an occupant in a crash.
Check My Case ↗
03 / 2023-2025
591,377
Instrument cluster blackout — RAV4, Highlander, Grand Highlander, Crown, GR Corolla, Tacoma, 4Runner, Camry Hybrid and Venza Hybrid, plus Lexus LS, RX and TX. Speed and brake warnings may not display.
Check My Case ↗
04 / CAMRY HYBRID, 2025-2026
508,354
Cluster fails at startup — Hazard lights, turn signals, the seat belt warning and the smart key reminder can all be deactivated by the same startup fault.
Check My Case ↗Campaign 25V744 covered 1,024,407 Toyota, Lexus and Subaru vehicles for a camera software fault. Software defects are intermittent, which is exactly why they take several visits before anyone accepts they are real. Figures from NHTSA as of 23 September 2026.
Read the 15 Questions ↗Toyota Lemon Law
15 questions Toyota owners ask.
General information about Lemon Law and warranty claims, not legal advice. What applies to a particular vehicle depends on its records, its warranty and the state where it was bought.
Ask Us Directly ↗
That visit still counts as a repair attempt, and with Toyota it is the central issue. The company's largest 2025 and 2026 campaigns are startup software faults — the cluster blackout on 591,377 vehicles, the camera freeze on 1,024,407 — which appear intermittently and often will not occur on demand at the service desk. Ask for the fault to be recorded in your words and keep the copy that says it could not be verified.
The individual campaigns are very large. Campaign 25V744 covered 1,024,407 Toyota, Lexus and Subaru vehicles for a rearview camera that freezes in reverse. 26V128 covered 686,588 Highlanders for second-row seat backs that may not lock. 25V595 covered 591,377 vehicles for an instrument cluster blackout, and 26V511 added 508,354 Camry Hybrids in August 2026.
Because Lexus has no separate NHTSA manufacturer record — campaigns are filed by Toyota Motor Engineering and Manufacturing — and Toyota builds the Subaru Solterra. One campaign number can therefore cover all three badges. It is normal, it does not weaken your claim, and it is useful evidence that the defect is a broad known pattern.
Losing the speedometer, the brake warning and the tire-pressure warning while driving impairs the use and safety of the vehicle, which is the legal test. Toyota has filed two large campaigns on it — 591,377 vehicles under 25V595 and 508,354 Camry Hybrids under 26V511. Whether your vehicle supports a claim depends on the repair history.
Yes. A remedy delivered as software is still a remedy, and the visit is still an attempt. This matters more for Toyota than for most manufacturers because so many of its recent campaigns are software-only. If the symptom returns after the update, that is another attempt, and the count builds exactly as it would with a mechanical repair.
No. A recall is the manufacturer acknowledging that a defect exists across a population of vehicles and offering a remedy. A Lemon Law claim arises from what happened to your specific vehicle: a substantial defect, reported inside the coverage period, that the manufacturer was given a reasonable number of attempts to repair and did not. The recall is useful evidence within that claim, not a substitute for it.
Yes, where the recall remedy addressed the defect at issue and the fault persisted afterward. Owners frequently leave recall visits out of their own count because the work was free and manufacturer-initiated, which weakens the record unnecessarily. If the vehicle went in for the fault and came back with the fault, it was an attempt.
Florida's presumption generally arises after three repair attempts for the same defect, or after the vehicle has been out of service for 30 or more cumulative days during the Lemon Law rights period. A separate and earlier trigger applies at 15 cumulative days, when written notice goes to the manufacturer. It is a presumption rather than a fixed requirement — a defect serious enough to be dangerous can qualify with fewer attempts, and the presumption is one route to the remedy rather than the only one.
New York generally looks for four repair attempts for the same defect, or 30 or more days out of service, within the first two years or 18,000 miles. The framework is close to Florida's but the thresholds and the arbitration process differ, and a vehicle bought in one state and serviced in another needs the applicable law identified early.
One that impairs the use, value or safety of the vehicle. Stalling, brake failure, steering faults and persistent electrical problems clearly qualify. A rattle or a trim complaint generally does not. Between those extremes the answer depends on how the fault affects the vehicle in normal use, and on what the repair orders actually say about it.
State Lemon Law is primarily directed at qualifying new and demonstrator vehicles. A used Toyota can still carry rights where a manufacturer or dealer warranty was active when the defect was reported, generally under federal warranty law including the Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act, which does not carry the same new-vehicle limitation.
A leased vehicle can be covered where it meets the same substantive requirements that apply to a purchase. The calculation of any refund is tied to the amounts actually paid into the lease rather than the full vehicle price, and the leasing company is dealt with as part of the resolution rather than left to be sorted out afterward.
That visit still counts as a repair attempt. Intermittent faults are extremely common in software, camera and electrical systems, and a growing share of manufacturer campaigns are software-related. A record of repeated visits where the fault was reported and not resolved is precisely the pattern the law addresses. Ask for the complaint to be written down in your words, and keep the copy that says it could not be verified.
Three, in practice. A repurchase, where the manufacturer buys the vehicle back and refunds what was paid, less a statutory offset for the miles driven before the first report of the defect. A replacement with a comparable vehicle. Or a cash settlement where the vehicle stays with you and the manufacturer pays for the diminished value. Which applies depends on the state, the facts and what is negotiated.
Broadly: the purchase price plus collateral and incidental charges, minus a mileage offset tied to the distance driven before the defect was first reported. Registration, taxes and finance charges are frequently recoverable. The offset is the part manufacturers most often calculate in their own favour, and it is worth checking line by line.
Other Manufacturers
The badge does not decide the claim.
The law applies the same way to every brand sold in the state. What differs is the defect pattern, the warranty terms and how hard the manufacturer fights.
Get in Touch
Is your Toyota back at the dealership again?
Send the year, model and the repair history — including the visits where they found nothing. Those are the ones that matter most here.
1-855-223-8344NO LEGAL FEES UNLESS WE WIN YOUR CASE · [email protected]
Get a Free Case Review
Complete the form below and tell us about your vehicle.